Leading Christian Resource for Avid Readers, Support New Schools with Every Purchase.

Closing the Quality Gap: a Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies: Volume 7 - Care Coordination

Paperback |English |1490382445 | 9781490382449

Closing the Quality Gap: a Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies: Volume 7 - Care Coordination

Paperback |English |1490382445 | 9781490382449
Overview
Many organizations and individuals are interested in care coordination, particularly as it relates to concerns about inefficiencies and suboptimal quality in the U.S. health care system. The Institute of Medicine identified care coordination as one of 20 national priorities for action to improve quality along its six dimensions of making care safe, effective, patient centered, timely, efficient, and equitable. The burgeoning number of aging Americans with chronic illnesses and the increasing complexity of care create challenges to coordination experienced at every level—the patient, the clinical practice, and the system. Care coordination interventions are particularly attractive in that they have the potential to improve both efficiency and quality. This final Evidence Report in the series “Closing the Quality Gap” by the Stanford-UCSF Evidence-based Practice Center addresses the topic of care coordination. This report describes our working definition of care coordination, summarizes some of the evidence about the effectiveness of care coordination interventions from systematic reviews, and presents relevant frameworks for the development and evaluation of future interventions. This approach may be useful to system-level policymakers, service-level decisionmakers, and patients. System-level policymakers have responsibility for paying for health care services for large numbers of individuals and making decisions about how to coordinate care at a system level in ways that minimize their financial risks and maximize the health care received by their population of patients. Service-level decisionmakers are involved in providing health care services to individual patients or a panel of patients, and therefore tackle care coordination at the service delivery level. Depending upon the particular local environment, they make decisions related to care coordination to maximize health care outcomes and use resources efficiently. Patients and their families are assuming increasingly active roles in health care decisionmaking and are navigating an increasingly complex health care system with consumer-driven health plans and other efforts to involve them more. The patient often experiences first-hand problems of coordination, and therefore may be just as interested as health care professionals in understanding care coordination. The key questions addressed in this Report relate to four areas: Ongoing Efforts in Care Coordination and Gaps in the Evidence: What aspects of care coordination are of greatest interest to healthcare decisionmakers? What are the key gaps in the care coordination evidence base? Definitions of Care Coordination and Related Terms: What definitions exist for care coordination? What definition could be formulated to apply to systematic reviews? Review of Systematic Reviews of Care Coordination Interventions: Which care coordination interventions have been evaluated by systematic reviews and how were they defined? What is the evidence regarding the health benefits of these care coordination interventions as summarized in the systematic review(s)? In particular, is the effectiveness of care coordination interventions related to the setting in which care is being coordinated, the component of care being coordinated, or the type of disease or patients for whom care is being coordinated? Have the costs of care coordination interventions been evaluated in any of these systematic reviews, and if so what is known? Conceptual Frameworks and Their Application to Evaluating Care Coordination Interventions: What concepts are important to understand and relate to each other for future evaluations of care coordination? What conceptual frameworks could be applied to support development and evaluation of strategies to improve care coordination? What measures have been used to assess care coordination? How do these frameworks relate to quality improvement strategies evaluated in the previous Closing the Quality Gap series reports?
ISBN: 1490382445
ISBN13: 9781490382449
Author: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Publisher: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform
Format: Paperback
PublicationDate: 2013-06-07
Language: English
PageCount: 214
Dimensions: 8.5 x 0.49 x 11.0 inches
Weight: 17.92 ounces
Many organizations and individuals are interested in care coordination, particularly as it relates to concerns about inefficiencies and suboptimal quality in the U.S. health care system. The Institute of Medicine identified care coordination as one of 20 national priorities for action to improve quality along its six dimensions of making care safe, effective, patient centered, timely, efficient, and equitable. The burgeoning number of aging Americans with chronic illnesses and the increasing complexity of care create challenges to coordination experienced at every level—the patient, the clinical practice, and the system. Care coordination interventions are particularly attractive in that they have the potential to improve both efficiency and quality. This final Evidence Report in the series “Closing the Quality Gap” by the Stanford-UCSF Evidence-based Practice Center addresses the topic of care coordination. This report describes our working definition of care coordination, summarizes some of the evidence about the effectiveness of care coordination interventions from systematic reviews, and presents relevant frameworks for the development and evaluation of future interventions. This approach may be useful to system-level policymakers, service-level decisionmakers, and patients. System-level policymakers have responsibility for paying for health care services for large numbers of individuals and making decisions about how to coordinate care at a system level in ways that minimize their financial risks and maximize the health care received by their population of patients. Service-level decisionmakers are involved in providing health care services to individual patients or a panel of patients, and therefore tackle care coordination at the service delivery level. Depending upon the particular local environment, they make decisions related to care coordination to maximize health care outcomes and use resources efficiently. Patients and their families are assuming increasingly active roles in health care decisionmaking and are navigating an increasingly complex health care system with consumer-driven health plans and other efforts to involve them more. The patient often experiences first-hand problems of coordination, and therefore may be just as interested as health care professionals in understanding care coordination. The key questions addressed in this Report relate to four areas: Ongoing Efforts in Care Coordination and Gaps in the Evidence: What aspects of care coordination are of greatest interest to healthcare decisionmakers? What are the key gaps in the care coordination evidence base? Definitions of Care Coordination and Related Terms: What definitions exist for care coordination? What definition could be formulated to apply to systematic reviews? Review of Systematic Reviews of Care Coordination Interventions: Which care coordination interventions have been evaluated by systematic reviews and how were they defined? What is the evidence regarding the health benefits of these care coordination interventions as summarized in the systematic review(s)? In particular, is the effectiveness of care coordination interventions related to the setting in which care is being coordinated, the component of care being coordinated, or the type of disease or patients for whom care is being coordinated? Have the costs of care coordination interventions been evaluated in any of these systematic reviews, and if so what is known? Conceptual Frameworks and Their Application to Evaluating Care Coordination Interventions: What concepts are important to understand and relate to each other for future evaluations of care coordination? What conceptual frameworks could be applied to support development and evaluation of strategies to improve care coordination? What measures have been used to assess care coordination? How do these frameworks relate to quality improvement strategies evaluated in the previous Closing the Quality Gap series reports?

Books - New and Used

The following guidelines apply to books:

  • New: A brand-new copy with cover and original protective wrapping intact. Books with markings of any kind on the cover or pages, books marked as "Bargain" or "Remainder," or with any other labels attached, may not be listed as New condition.
  • Used - Good: All pages and cover are intact (including the dust cover, if applicable). Spine may show signs of wear. Pages may include limited notes and highlighting. May include "From the library of" labels. Shrink wrap, dust covers, or boxed set case may be missing. Item may be missing bundled media.
  • Used - Acceptable: All pages and the cover are intact, but shrink wrap, dust covers, or boxed set case may be missing. Pages may include limited notes, highlighting, or minor water damage but the text is readable. Item may but the dust cover may be missing. Pages may include limited notes and highlighting, but the text cannot be obscured or unreadable.

Note: Some electronic material access codes are valid only for one user. For this reason, used books, including books listed in the Used – Like New condition, may not come with functional electronic material access codes.

Shipping Fees

  • Stevens Books offers FREE SHIPPING everywhere in the United States for ALL non-book orders, and $3.99 for each book.
  • Packages are shipped from Monday to Friday.
  • No additional fees and charges.

Delivery Times

The usual time for processing an order is 24 hours (1 business day), but may vary depending on the availability of products ordered. This period excludes delivery times, which depend on your geographic location.

Estimated delivery times:

  • Standard Shipping: 5-8 business days
  • Expedited Shipping: 3-5 business days

Shipping method varies depending on what is being shipped.  

Tracking
All orders are shipped with a tracking number. Once your order has left our warehouse, a confirmation e-mail with a tracking number will be sent to you. You will be able to track your package at all times. 

Damaged Parcel
If your package has been delivered in a PO Box, please note that we are not responsible for any damage that may result (consequences of extreme temperatures, theft, etc.). 

If you have any questions regarding shipping or want to know about the status of an order, please contact us or email to support@stevensbooks.com.

You may return most items within 30 days of delivery for a full refund.

To be eligible for a return, your item must be unused and in the same condition that you received it. It must also be in the original packaging.

Several types of goods are exempt from being returned. Perishable goods such as food, flowers, newspapers or magazines cannot be returned. We also do not accept products that are intimate or sanitary goods, hazardous materials, or flammable liquids or gases.

Additional non-returnable items:

  • Gift cards
  • Downloadable software products
  • Some health and personal care items

To complete your return, we require a tracking number, which shows the items which you already returned to us.
There are certain situations where only partial refunds are granted (if applicable)

  • Book with obvious signs of use
  • CD, DVD, VHS tape, software, video game, cassette tape, or vinyl record that has been opened
  • Any item not in its original condition, is damaged or missing parts for reasons not due to our error
  • Any item that is returned more than 30 days after delivery

Items returned to us as a result of our error will receive a full refund,some returns may be subject to a restocking fee of 7% of the total item price, please contact a customer care team member to see if your return is subject. Returns that arrived on time and were as described are subject to a restocking fee.

Items returned to us that were not the result of our error, including items returned to us due to an invalid or incomplete address, will be refunded the original item price less our standard restocking fees.

If the item is returned to us for any of the following reasons, a 15% restocking fee will be applied to your refund total and you will be asked to pay for return shipping:

  • Item(s) no longer needed or wanted.
  • Item(s) returned to us due to an invalid or incomplete address.
  • Item(s) returned to us that were not a result of our error.

You should expect to receive your refund within four weeks of giving your package to the return shipper, however, in many cases you will receive a refund more quickly. This time period includes the transit time for us to receive your return from the shipper (5 to 10 business days), the time it takes us to process your return once we receive it (3 to 5 business days), and the time it takes your bank to process our refund request (5 to 10 business days).

If you need to return an item, please Contact Us with your order number and details about the product you would like to return. We will respond quickly with instructions for how to return items from your order.


Shipping Cost


We'll pay the return shipping costs if the return is a result of our error (you received an incorrect or defective item, etc.). In other cases, you will be responsible for paying for your own shipping costs for returning your item. Shipping costs are non-refundable. If you receive a refund, the cost of return shipping will be deducted from your refund.

Depending on where you live, the time it may take for your exchanged product to reach you, may vary.

If you are shipping an item over $75, you should consider using a trackable shipping service or purchasing shipping insurance. We don’t guarantee that we will receive your returned item.

$39.74

    Condition

Arrives: -
In Stock

Overview
Many organizations and individuals are interested in care coordination, particularly as it relates to concerns about inefficiencies and suboptimal quality in the U.S. health care system. The Institute of Medicine identified care coordination as one of 20 national priorities for action to improve quality along its six dimensions of making care safe, effective, patient centered, timely, efficient, and equitable. The burgeoning number of aging Americans with chronic illnesses and the increasing complexity of care create challenges to coordination experienced at every level—the patient, the clinical practice, and the system. Care coordination interventions are particularly attractive in that they have the potential to improve both efficiency and quality. This final Evidence Report in the series “Closing the Quality Gap” by the Stanford-UCSF Evidence-based Practice Center addresses the topic of care coordination. This report describes our working definition of care coordination, summarizes some of the evidence about the effectiveness of care coordination interventions from systematic reviews, and presents relevant frameworks for the development and evaluation of future interventions. This approach may be useful to system-level policymakers, service-level decisionmakers, and patients. System-level policymakers have responsibility for paying for health care services for large numbers of individuals and making decisions about how to coordinate care at a system level in ways that minimize their financial risks and maximize the health care received by their population of patients. Service-level decisionmakers are involved in providing health care services to individual patients or a panel of patients, and therefore tackle care coordination at the service delivery level. Depending upon the particular local environment, they make decisions related to care coordination to maximize health care outcomes and use resources efficiently. Patients and their families are assuming increasingly active roles in health care decisionmaking and are navigating an increasingly complex health care system with consumer-driven health plans and other efforts to involve them more. The patient often experiences first-hand problems of coordination, and therefore may be just as interested as health care professionals in understanding care coordination. The key questions addressed in this Report relate to four areas: Ongoing Efforts in Care Coordination and Gaps in the Evidence: What aspects of care coordination are of greatest interest to healthcare decisionmakers? What are the key gaps in the care coordination evidence base? Definitions of Care Coordination and Related Terms: What definitions exist for care coordination? What definition could be formulated to apply to systematic reviews? Review of Systematic Reviews of Care Coordination Interventions: Which care coordination interventions have been evaluated by systematic reviews and how were they defined? What is the evidence regarding the health benefits of these care coordination interventions as summarized in the systematic review(s)? In particular, is the effectiveness of care coordination interventions related to the setting in which care is being coordinated, the component of care being coordinated, or the type of disease or patients for whom care is being coordinated? Have the costs of care coordination interventions been evaluated in any of these systematic reviews, and if so what is known? Conceptual Frameworks and Their Application to Evaluating Care Coordination Interventions: What concepts are important to understand and relate to each other for future evaluations of care coordination? What conceptual frameworks could be applied to support development and evaluation of strategies to improve care coordination? What measures have been used to assess care coordination? How do these frameworks relate to quality improvement strategies evaluated in the previous Closing the Quality Gap series reports?
ISBN: 1490382445
ISBN13: 9781490382449
Author: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Publisher: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform
Format: Paperback
PublicationDate: 2013-06-07
Language: English
PageCount: 214
Dimensions: 8.5 x 0.49 x 11.0 inches
Weight: 17.92 ounces
Many organizations and individuals are interested in care coordination, particularly as it relates to concerns about inefficiencies and suboptimal quality in the U.S. health care system. The Institute of Medicine identified care coordination as one of 20 national priorities for action to improve quality along its six dimensions of making care safe, effective, patient centered, timely, efficient, and equitable. The burgeoning number of aging Americans with chronic illnesses and the increasing complexity of care create challenges to coordination experienced at every level—the patient, the clinical practice, and the system. Care coordination interventions are particularly attractive in that they have the potential to improve both efficiency and quality. This final Evidence Report in the series “Closing the Quality Gap” by the Stanford-UCSF Evidence-based Practice Center addresses the topic of care coordination. This report describes our working definition of care coordination, summarizes some of the evidence about the effectiveness of care coordination interventions from systematic reviews, and presents relevant frameworks for the development and evaluation of future interventions. This approach may be useful to system-level policymakers, service-level decisionmakers, and patients. System-level policymakers have responsibility for paying for health care services for large numbers of individuals and making decisions about how to coordinate care at a system level in ways that minimize their financial risks and maximize the health care received by their population of patients. Service-level decisionmakers are involved in providing health care services to individual patients or a panel of patients, and therefore tackle care coordination at the service delivery level. Depending upon the particular local environment, they make decisions related to care coordination to maximize health care outcomes and use resources efficiently. Patients and their families are assuming increasingly active roles in health care decisionmaking and are navigating an increasingly complex health care system with consumer-driven health plans and other efforts to involve them more. The patient often experiences first-hand problems of coordination, and therefore may be just as interested as health care professionals in understanding care coordination. The key questions addressed in this Report relate to four areas: Ongoing Efforts in Care Coordination and Gaps in the Evidence: What aspects of care coordination are of greatest interest to healthcare decisionmakers? What are the key gaps in the care coordination evidence base? Definitions of Care Coordination and Related Terms: What definitions exist for care coordination? What definition could be formulated to apply to systematic reviews? Review of Systematic Reviews of Care Coordination Interventions: Which care coordination interventions have been evaluated by systematic reviews and how were they defined? What is the evidence regarding the health benefits of these care coordination interventions as summarized in the systematic review(s)? In particular, is the effectiveness of care coordination interventions related to the setting in which care is being coordinated, the component of care being coordinated, or the type of disease or patients for whom care is being coordinated? Have the costs of care coordination interventions been evaluated in any of these systematic reviews, and if so what is known? Conceptual Frameworks and Their Application to Evaluating Care Coordination Interventions: What concepts are important to understand and relate to each other for future evaluations of care coordination? What conceptual frameworks could be applied to support development and evaluation of strategies to improve care coordination? What measures have been used to assess care coordination? How do these frameworks relate to quality improvement strategies evaluated in the previous Closing the Quality Gap series reports?

Books - New and Used

The following guidelines apply to books:

  • New: A brand-new copy with cover and original protective wrapping intact. Books with markings of any kind on the cover or pages, books marked as "Bargain" or "Remainder," or with any other labels attached, may not be listed as New condition.
  • Used - Good: All pages and cover are intact (including the dust cover, if applicable). Spine may show signs of wear. Pages may include limited notes and highlighting. May include "From the library of" labels. Shrink wrap, dust covers, or boxed set case may be missing. Item may be missing bundled media.
  • Used - Acceptable: All pages and the cover are intact, but shrink wrap, dust covers, or boxed set case may be missing. Pages may include limited notes, highlighting, or minor water damage but the text is readable. Item may but the dust cover may be missing. Pages may include limited notes and highlighting, but the text cannot be obscured or unreadable.

Note: Some electronic material access codes are valid only for one user. For this reason, used books, including books listed in the Used – Like New condition, may not come with functional electronic material access codes.

Shipping Fees

  • Stevens Books offers FREE SHIPPING everywhere in the United States for ALL non-book orders, and $3.99 for each book.
  • Packages are shipped from Monday to Friday.
  • No additional fees and charges.

Delivery Times

The usual time for processing an order is 24 hours (1 business day), but may vary depending on the availability of products ordered. This period excludes delivery times, which depend on your geographic location.

Estimated delivery times:

  • Standard Shipping: 5-8 business days
  • Expedited Shipping: 3-5 business days

Shipping method varies depending on what is being shipped.  

Tracking
All orders are shipped with a tracking number. Once your order has left our warehouse, a confirmation e-mail with a tracking number will be sent to you. You will be able to track your package at all times. 

Damaged Parcel
If your package has been delivered in a PO Box, please note that we are not responsible for any damage that may result (consequences of extreme temperatures, theft, etc.). 

If you have any questions regarding shipping or want to know about the status of an order, please contact us or email to support@stevensbooks.com.

You may return most items within 30 days of delivery for a full refund.

To be eligible for a return, your item must be unused and in the same condition that you received it. It must also be in the original packaging.

Several types of goods are exempt from being returned. Perishable goods such as food, flowers, newspapers or magazines cannot be returned. We also do not accept products that are intimate or sanitary goods, hazardous materials, or flammable liquids or gases.

Additional non-returnable items:

  • Gift cards
  • Downloadable software products
  • Some health and personal care items

To complete your return, we require a tracking number, which shows the items which you already returned to us.
There are certain situations where only partial refunds are granted (if applicable)

  • Book with obvious signs of use
  • CD, DVD, VHS tape, software, video game, cassette tape, or vinyl record that has been opened
  • Any item not in its original condition, is damaged or missing parts for reasons not due to our error
  • Any item that is returned more than 30 days after delivery

Items returned to us as a result of our error will receive a full refund,some returns may be subject to a restocking fee of 7% of the total item price, please contact a customer care team member to see if your return is subject. Returns that arrived on time and were as described are subject to a restocking fee.

Items returned to us that were not the result of our error, including items returned to us due to an invalid or incomplete address, will be refunded the original item price less our standard restocking fees.

If the item is returned to us for any of the following reasons, a 15% restocking fee will be applied to your refund total and you will be asked to pay for return shipping:

  • Item(s) no longer needed or wanted.
  • Item(s) returned to us due to an invalid or incomplete address.
  • Item(s) returned to us that were not a result of our error.

You should expect to receive your refund within four weeks of giving your package to the return shipper, however, in many cases you will receive a refund more quickly. This time period includes the transit time for us to receive your return from the shipper (5 to 10 business days), the time it takes us to process your return once we receive it (3 to 5 business days), and the time it takes your bank to process our refund request (5 to 10 business days).

If you need to return an item, please Contact Us with your order number and details about the product you would like to return. We will respond quickly with instructions for how to return items from your order.


Shipping Cost


We'll pay the return shipping costs if the return is a result of our error (you received an incorrect or defective item, etc.). In other cases, you will be responsible for paying for your own shipping costs for returning your item. Shipping costs are non-refundable. If you receive a refund, the cost of return shipping will be deducted from your refund.

Depending on where you live, the time it may take for your exchanged product to reach you, may vary.

If you are shipping an item over $75, you should consider using a trackable shipping service or purchasing shipping insurance. We don’t guarantee that we will receive your returned item.

X

Oops!

Sorry, it looks like some products are not available in selected quantity.

OK

Sign up to the Stevens Books Newsletter

For the latest books, recommendations, author interviews and more

By signing up, I confirm that I'm over 16. To find out what personal data we collect and how we use it, please visit. our Privacy Policy.